22phmaya.ROYAL888 deposit,Apaldo redeem code

High Stakes Poker Reviewed: Negreanu Comes Out Firing on Series Debut

2 min read
Daniel Negreanu

Fans of "classic" era televised poker often highlight High Stakes Poker as a high water mark when it comes to such programming.

The show debuted in early 2006 at the height of the poker "boom," running for seven seasons and 98 episodes, the last of which aired in the spring of 2011. Many of poker's most famous players took part, with buy-ins ranging from $100,000 to $1 million and the pots sometimes reaching the high six figures. In fact, once in Season 4 when Guy Lalibert�� and David Benyamine built a pot of more than $1.2 million in a hand before negotiating to reduce it.

Years later the shows remain highly entertaining, and can even be educational. For new poker players they introduce the game while illustrating many strategic concepts, while those with experience can watch and recognize how certain strategies have evolved over the years since the shows aired.

For the first episode of the first season, Daniel Negreanu hit the ground running with a lot of aggressive play early on.

High Stakes Poker: Season 1, Episode 1

Originally aired:January 16, 2006
Location:Golden Nugget, Las Vegas
Players:Daniel Alaei, Doyle Brunson, Jerry Buss, Ted Forrest, Barry Greenstein, Jennifer Harman, Amir Nasseri, Daniel Negreanu
Commentators:A.J. Benza, Gabe Kaplan
Game:no-limit hold'em cash game, minimum $100,000 buy-in
Stakes:blinds $300/$600, ante $100

Strategic Concepts

  • overbetting �� by Negreanu on the flop in a three-way hand with Nasseri and Buss �� 5:00 mark
  • limping �� frequently represented; see, for instance, Brunson do so with ace-king (and then overbet afterwards) �� 13:00 mark
  • slow playing �� by Nasseri with pocket aces in a hand versus Alaei �� 24:00 mark

Big Hand Alert

  • a set-over-set situation leads to Nassari and Forrest building a pot of $206,600 �� 30:00 mark
Share this article
author

More Stories

Other Stories

Recommended for you

ICM and Overcalling: Analyzing Alex Foxen¡¯s Final Table Decisions ICM and Overcalling: Analyzing Alex Foxen��s Final Table Decisions